Skoda Kylaq vs Kushaq Real-World Efficiency Compared

The Skoda Kylaq and Skoda Kushaq may appear to be two different SUVs in terms of size and positioning, but under the skin, they share a lot more than you might think. Both are powered by the same 115hp, 1.0-litre turbo-petrol engine, come with 6-speed manual and automatic gearbox options, and are based on similar architecture. However, there are key differences when it comes to weight, size, fuel tank capacity, and real-world fuel efficiency.

This comparison explores how the two SUVs perform in terms of mileage in real-world driving conditions and whether the smaller, lighter Kylaq manages to outshine its bigger sibling, the Kushaq.

Shared Foundations, Key Differences

At the heart of both SUVs is the same 999cc, 3-cylinder turbo-petrol engine, producing 115hp and 178Nm of torque. Gearbox choices include a 6-speed manual and a 6-speed torque converter automatic.

The only mechanical difference lies in kerb weight. The Kylaq is about 29 kg lighter than the Kushaq across both manual and automatic trims. This gives the Kylaq slightly better power-to-weight and torque-to-weight ratios, translating into minor advantages in responsiveness and efficiency.

Quick Summary

Skoda Kylaq MT vs Kushaq MT: Real-World Efficiency

ARAI Figures

• Kylaq MT: 19.68 kpl
• Kushaq MT: 19.76 kpl

Real-World Test Results

• City Mileage:
  • Kylaq MT: 10.60 kpl
  • Kushaq MT: 11.80 kpl
• Highway Mileage:
  • Kylaq MT: 15.12 kpl
  • Kushaq MT: 14.30 kpl
• Combined Average:
  • Kylaq MT: 12.86 kpl
  • Kushaq MT: 13.05 kpl

Despite being lighter, the Kylaq MT surprisingly trails the Kushaq MT in city mileage. The Kushaq MT delivers 11.8 kpl in the city, compared to the Kylaq MT’s 10.6 kpl. However, the Kylaq claws back efficiency on the highway with 15.12 kpl, versus the Kushaq’s 14.30 kpl. Overall, the Kushaq edges ahead slightly with a 13.05 kpl average, compared to the Kylaq’s 12.86 kpl.

Range Advantage

Thanks to its 50-litre fuel tank, the Kushaq can travel about 652 km on a single tank, compared to the Kylaq’s 579 km range from its smaller 45-litre tank.

Skoda Kylaq AT vs Kushaq AT: Real-World Efficiency

ARAI Figures

• Kylaq AT: 19.05 kpl
• Kushaq AT: 18.09 kpl

Real-World Test Results

• City Mileage:
  • Kylaq AT: 8.70 kpl
  • Kushaq AT: 8.50 kpl
• Highway Mileage:
  • Kylaq AT: 13.36 kpl
  • Kushaq AT: 12.40 kpl
• Combined Average:
  • Kylaq AT: 11.03 kpl
  • Kushaq AT: 10.45 kpl

Here, the Kylaq AT emerges as the more efficient SUV. Despite the Kushaq’s larger tank, the Kylaq delivers 0.58 kpl higher mileage, both in city and highway conditions.

Range Comparison

• Kylaq AT: 496 km (45L tank)
• Kushaq AT: 522 km (50L tank)

Even though the Kylaq is more efficient, the Kushaq AT has a longer range due to its larger 50-litre tank.

Testing Methodology

To ensure fairness and accuracy, the test cars were:

• Filled to the brim before each test cycle.
• Driven with tyre pressures set as per manufacturer’s recommendations.
• Run on fixed loops in Navi Mumbai (city) and nearby highways.
• Driven at consistent average speeds with only one occupant.
• Air conditioning, infotainment, and electricals used as a regular driver would.
• Driver swaps conducted periodically to neutralize individual driving styles.

This standardized testing ensures results reflect real-world usage conditions.

Key Takeaways

• Manual Variants: The Kushaq MT edges ahead with slightly better city mileage and overall efficiency, despite the Kylaq being lighter.
• Automatic Variants: The Kylaq AT outperforms the Kushaq AT, proving more efficient both in city and highway driving.
• Fuel Tank Advantage: The Kushaq’s larger 50-litre tank gives it a longer driving range, even when the Kylaq is marginally more efficient.
• Practical Insight: Buyers prioritizing long-distance driving may prefer the Kushaq, while city-focused users could benefit from the Kylaq’s lighter body and highway efficiency.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. Which is more fuel-efficient: Skoda Kylaq or Skoda Kushaq?

• In manual form, the Kushaq MT is slightly more efficient.
• In automatic form, the Kylaq AT is more efficient.

2. What is the real-world mileage of the Skoda Kylaq?

• MT: 12.86 kpl average
• AT: 11.03 kpl average

3. What is the real-world mileage of the Skoda Kushaq?

• MT: 13.05 kpl average
• AT: 10.45 kpl average

4. Which SUV has a larger fuel tank?

The Kushaq has a 50-litre tank, while the Kylaq has a 45-litre tank.

5. Where can I check official details of both SUVs?

You can visit Skoda Auto India for specifications, variants, and pricing.

Conclusion

The Skoda Kylaq and Kushaq may share engines, transmissions, and most design elements, but their real-world fuel efficiency results differ slightly. The Kushaq MT delivers better overall efficiency and range, while the Kylaq AT edges out the Kushaq AT in mileage.

Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on usage:

• Long-distance drivers may prefer the Kushaq with its bigger tank and range.
• Urban buyers who want a lighter, efficient SUV may lean toward the Kylaq, especially in automatic guise.

Both SUVs remain strong options in Skoda’s lineup, offering efficiency, performance, and European build quality.

For More Information Click HERE